tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-319091052024-03-12T20:51:22.945-07:00The Snark's ReviewMusings on the media, politics, and current affairsThe Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.comBlogger267125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-4995968945927269722013-09-09T05:33:00.001-07:002013-09-09T05:33:35.287-07:00<script src="http://www.libertyactioncenter.com/1/52282828-4a90-4c79-a807-7a5932741282" type="text/javascript"></script>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-64263015327982579442012-05-17T07:39:00.001-07:002013-06-14T14:14:35.201-07:00Which Obama?I would far rather hear Obama foreswear aggressive, pre-emptive, non-constitutionally-authorized war and to swear a commitment to restoring the Bill of Rights and the value of the Dollar than to make a mealy-mouthed, unenforceable comment about "supporting" gay marriage. It is nice to see a liberal supporting States' Rights though.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-27894719366687969222012-02-22T20:12:00.001-08:002012-02-22T20:17:07.335-08:00The Fake<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;">During the GOP debate in Mesa, AZ, John King asked Representative Ron Paul why his new ads label former-senator Rick Santorum "a fake"? Paul replied, "because he is." That got a large laugh from the attendees in the performance arts center in Mesa, and it got Santorum's temper up, which is always a good place for it to be. <br /><br />For the entire rest of the evening, Santorum proceeded with one excuse and rationalization after another to prove Paul correct. Hopefully the people of Arizona noticed, especially when he rationalized that the reason he spent so much time on Social Security and Medicare issues was "because all my rich seniors moved to Florida and Arizona." (I assume he meant Medicare prescription drug coverage, the biggest expansion of entitlements since the Johnson era.)</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;"><br /></span><br />
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;">Earlier in the week we found out that four years ago Santorum declared 45 million American Protestants no longer to be Christians. Now he is accusing Arizona's massive retiree population of abandoning their social responsibilities back home in Pennsylvania. This sure is a strange approach for trying to win an election.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;">I'm not exactly sure that Santorum sounds like a liberal (as Paul accuses), but he sure doesn't sound like a conservative either--and he definitely isn't a libertarian. He mostly just sounds like an angry teenager who doesn't yet know what he wants to be when he grows up, but who does know that, whatever it is, he wants to judge and hurt people. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;"><br /></span></div>
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: x-small;">That should equally scare Catholics, Protestants, liberals, conservatives, and just about everyone else on the planet. The last thing America needs at this point is a president who is more temperamentally suited to working at Abu Graib than as a diplomatic peacemaker.</span></div>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-82014730801410526572012-01-18T03:46:00.000-08:002012-01-18T04:00:45.939-08:00SOPA / SIPA BOYCOTT<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="http://americancensorship.org/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: black; color: #666666;">http://americancensorship.org/</span></a></div>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-63113786551728848452011-09-20T07:07:00.000-07:002011-09-20T07:08:44.216-07:00Surprise, surprise...<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 17px;">So it turns out that a former analyst for the CIA's Bin Laden Unit,</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 17px;"> </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 17px;"><a href="http://non-intervention.com/" style="cursor: pointer; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px; outline-color: initial; outline-style: initial; outline-width: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px; text-decoration: underline;" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span">Michael Scheuer</span></a>, supports Ron Paul's suggested changes in U.S. foreign policy</span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 17px;">. Mr. Scheuer observes, </span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 17px;"><i>‘the real danger is if we attack them, they would never attack us first but if we the Isrealis or both [the U.S. and the Israelis] attack them, will see a lot of terrorism in our country [the U.S.] conducted by the Iranians’</i>. See the article and listen to the entire interview <a href="http://libertypulse.com/blog/2011/09/19/cia-analyst-scheuer/">here</a>.</span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; line-height: 17px;">Sounds like that translates into: Israel has become the greatest threat to American peace and security -- not to mention a drain on our economy. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; line-height: 17px;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="background-color: white; font-family: inherit; line-height: 17px;">[<i>Ed.:</i> A consolation (<i>see below</i>): at least <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Defense_Forces#LGBT_people">we know the Israelis haven't spent any American tax money prosecuting their service men and women for being born with the wrong sexual orientation</a>. <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2011/01/dont_ask_dont_tell_cost_milita.html">The Pentagon, under both Bush and Obama, spent plenty of money doing that themselves</a>.]</span>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-71946862695539822242011-09-20T06:20:00.000-07:002011-09-20T07:16:59.453-07:00A Step into the Sunlight<a href="http://www.google.com/doodle4google/history.html">Google</a> is a socially responsible company that celebrates events such as "Wildebeest Migration Day," "Medellin Flower Celebration Day," and the birthdays of important artists and scientists with custom "doodle art" on their homepage.
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WdTfwy0Yw6U/TniR_Z_fRlI/AAAAAAAAAHw/AGbLca0XAk0/s1600/medellin11-hp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="76" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-WdTfwy0Yw6U/TniR_Z_fRlI/AAAAAAAAAHw/AGbLca0XAk0/s200/medellin11-hp.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2yy2L2aR1tI/TniR-OE1i6I/AAAAAAAAAHo/oppPm-7GveY/s1600/goethe-2011-hp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="76" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-2yy2L2aR1tI/TniR-OE1i6I/AAAAAAAAAHo/oppPm-7GveY/s200/goethe-2011-hp.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JzLPDyH_ybs/TniR-8THBCI/AAAAAAAAAHs/RoAjxwrzwaI/s1600/gregormendel11-hp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="76" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JzLPDyH_ybs/TniR-8THBCI/AAAAAAAAAHs/RoAjxwrzwaI/s200/gregormendel11-hp.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; color: black;"></span></span><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
They also do this to mark the "independence" days of virtually every country on the planet, even for those countries that were never colonized or liberated.
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9TaFeqUlNDw/TniSAHevlkI/AAAAAAAAAH0/eVL1WgxgjKA/s1600/switzerland_national_day-11-hp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="88" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-9TaFeqUlNDw/TniSAHevlkI/AAAAAAAAAH0/eVL1WgxgjKA/s200/switzerland_national_day-11-hp.jpg" width="200" /></a><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-d54Wa61FzWw/TniSA4I4n2I/AAAAAAAAAH4/JPJDHJbaTgE/s1600/tanabata-2011-hp.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="85" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-d54Wa61FzWw/TniSA4I4n2I/AAAAAAAAAH4/JPJDHJbaTgE/s200/tanabata-2011-hp.jpg" width="200" /></a></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">It is sad to note though, that Google didn't see fit to mark today's liberation of a few million Americans, Americans who will for the first time will be able to step out into the sunlight while wearing a uniform, the uniform of the United States military. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-buzz/post/where-to-celebrate-dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-in-dc/2011/09/20/gIQARvXuhK_blog.html">"Don't Ask Don't Tell" may have ended, institutional discrimination in the military may have ended</a>, but clearly there is work yet to be done. Perhaps Google doesn't want to call attention to the fact that the political party who promised Gay service members liberation took almost 20 years to make good on that promise. Perhaps it was just an oversight. In either case, it is unfortunate.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">If there are any artists out there who want to send <a href="mailto:thesnarkmeister@gmail.com">the Snarkmeister</a> their version of the art that Google should have posted, we'll make our best effort to display it.</span>
The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-12494915364946714352011-09-13T09:29:00.000-07:002011-09-13T09:29:43.107-07:00Buy a clue, Dick.Dick Cheney was on <i>The View</i> today, making the argument that the U.S. needs to stay in Afghanistan "until they can defend themselves." The Afghanis' ability to defend themselves, all too well, is a large part of the reason way we're still there. The Afghanis are the most defense capable people on the face of the planet. In known history, no foreign occupier has held Afghani territory for more than a few years, and always at a high cost to the occupier. Trying to occupy and hold Afghanistan was a large part of what brought down the Soviet Union. It is fast becoming a large part of what is going to bring down the U.S.<br />
<br />
The U.S. arrogantly thinks we have something to teach the Afghan people about self-defense. We should be asking them to come to America to teach us. With our military spread out all around the world, our borders at home undefended, our economy in ruins, and the average American terrified to even touch a gun, it is only a matter of time before someone is going to see the "American corporation" as a prime target for a hostile takeover. Given the current state of things, Canada could probably take control the U.S. in about 48 hours.<br />
<br />
In the meantime, America is "celebrating" the day ten years ago when a few guys with box cutters where able to cower several hundred Americans into becoming flying missiles. Why was that even possible? Because the American government had deprived pilots of the right to carry weapons and because Americans have been conditioned not to defend themselves.<br />
<br />
Buy a clue, Dick. Wake up, America. We don't need to change Afghanistan, we need to become more like Afghanistan. No planes full Afghanis ever would have been flown into the sides of buildings. The hijackers would have been tossed from the planes, at altitude.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-63220747777106697832011-09-01T18:34:00.000-07:002011-09-02T10:13:43.793-07:00Operation Fast and Furious<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px;"></span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">Anyone who believes that <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/08/atf-chief-ousted-amid-gun-trafficking-probes/1">some bureaucrat</a></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"> sent 2,000 weapons into an allied nation, knowingly into the hands of a criminal element that has been actively working to undermine that country's government, without the direct sign-off of the president of the United States, is a fool. </span><br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fast_and_Furious">Operation Fast and Furious</a> could by any almost any standard be interpreted as an act of war against Mexico by the United States government. No one, at any level of government would do such a thing without White House approval, although in all likelihood the White House would have attempted to ensure itself a reasonable level of deniability. That deniability is not credible on its face though. One country arming a group within another country, a group that is not part of its sovereign government, is de facto war.<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">What most likely gives Obama his Get Out of Jail Free Card is that the Mexican government most likely knew about Operation Fast and Furious and was complicate with it, which is a very dangerous position for a government that is already on the verge of being a failed state to have taken. Right now the Mexican people are mostly furious at America over the drug violence that has <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-10681249">killed almost 35,000 people in the last five years</a>, but if they knew their own government was helping to facilitate it, that anger could quickly boil over into internal chaos. Perhaps that is exactly the U.S. plan. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">Such machinations are a perfect example of why WikiLeaks serves a vital public interest.</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><br />
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;">[Update: <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/02/demand-for-more-answers-in-fast-and-furious-scandal/">Members of congress are starting to ask questions as well</a>.]</span>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-25657589706358813122011-09-01T17:02:00.000-07:002011-09-02T06:02:47.948-07:00John Brown's Body Lies a Spinning in His GraveConsider the following comment about President Obama from a recent <a href="http://watchingamerica.com/News/118844/about-weak-leadership/"><i>Der Standard </i>article</a>, one of Austria's largest newspapers:<br />
<blockquote>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;">Two-and-a-half years after his election, Barack Obama, the first African-American president in the history of the United States, is in danger of becoming a one-term president, a failure who has largely lost the support of the urban liberals, workers, black and Hispanic Americans, environmentalists and youth of the 2008 election through his hesitation and wavering. The 50-year-old Obama is no longer the shining light for the start of a new age, but rather a politician, who, through his zigzag course and sellouts in economic, finance and social policy, has deeply disappointed the (admittedly inflated) expectations of his supporters.</span></blockquote>
Perhaps Barack Obama's biggest crime is that because of his broken promises, because his weakness and inaction, because of his war-making and continuance of Bush-era civil liberty violations -- because of all of this -- it is likely that no other minority-American candidate for higher office will be given the benefit of the doubt for a generation. Perhaps for even longer. Obama's biggest crime is that he has made statements like that which titles this post conceptually plausible, rather than merely racist -- and that is perhaps the one thing he has done that is unforgivable.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-76243362465386217992011-09-01T16:44:00.000-07:002011-09-02T06:02:14.544-07:00What, five wars isn't enough?The warmongers over at FoxNews are calling for yet another war, a cyber war. This one against WikiLeaks, for revealing America's "secrets." Of course, most of the secrets weren't actually about America, but about America's international meddling in the affairs in other countries and about the corruption our spies and diplomats had fomented in those countries.<br />
<br />
It was exactly the release of that information that lead to what has become called the "Arab Spring." It was when the people of countries like Egypt and Libya realized how corrupt and in-bed with Washington their leaders were that they finally rose up against the dictatorships that Langley and Foggy Bottom had been imposing on them for decades. Julian Assange jump-started democracy in half-a-dozen countries with only a few keystrokes and a few servers, something that George Bush (and now Barack Obama) haven't been able to accomplish in a even one country, despite trillions of dollars and tens of thousands of lives destroyed.<br />
<br />
So why is Fox News upset? That is a good question. Supposedly they are the "conservative" news source in America. The truth is though, FoxNew is not conservative, but rather neo-conservative. It always has been. And the neo-conservative movement is about anything but freedom or liberty. Given the association of both the Bush and Obama administrations with the neo-con and neo-liberal movements, one has to wonder if democracy in Iraq was really ever America's real purpose. With that question in mind, it should be Americans who should be rioting in the streets.<br />
<br />
This country was founded on the idea of free speech, on the idea of a free press, on the idea that people should be free in their persons and papers, that the country should mind its own business. All of that is right there in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution that real conservatives hold so holy -- or at least claim to. This country was not supposed to have secrets. It was not supposed to be waging war willy-nilly at the president's whim. It was not supposed to be occupying nations and imposing democracy and forcing open markets for corporations. It was not supposed to be committing the type of war crimes that requires a WikiLeaks to expose those crimes.<br />
<br />
Any true American, conservative or liberal, should be supporting the restoration of an America where WikiLeaks would have nothing to report on. It is only the neo-cons and neo-liberals (very little difference really, they are all fascist), and their internationalist corporate-statists friends who have reason to hate WikiLeaks.<br />
<br />
When America was a free and tolerant, nominally Christian country, it knew a simply truth: 'All those who doeth evil hateth the light.'<br />
<br />
WikiLeaks is shining a light on a very different America though, on a country that has become far worse than the empire it once overthrew, on a country whose banks and corporations are attempting to reinstate a neo-feudalist order, and on a country where the blood-lusters seem to hold the biggest sway. Those who are calling for war against WikiLeaks are in truth calling for a war against those who would shine light on and do battle against evil. Those who are calling for war against WikiLeaks are in truth calling for the preservation and protection of the evil doers and the darkness within which they operate.<br />
<br />
Shame on any conservative who has let themselves be fooled by Fox's faux-conservative worldview. It is not an American view at all. The truth is right there in the founding documents.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-84790888255573302552011-08-30T07:56:00.000-07:002011-08-30T07:56:51.220-07:00Man the Gates!The Jon Stewart video below tangentially brings up the issue of immigration and border protection.<br />
<br />
Isn't this something that we should start having a serious constitutional discussion about? <br />
<br />
Consider the following: The Constitution has been interpreted to grant exclusive control over and responsibility for customs, immigration, and defense of the borders and waters of the United States, to the Federal Government. This is the root the ongoing spat between the State of Arizona (and now also Alabama), who want the right to seek out and deport illegal immigrants. The federal government claims it is their job and their job only. The problem is, they aren't doing the job, and won't do the job. They haven't been doing it for a very long time. <br />
<br />
Consider...<br />
<br />
9/11 -- For the sake of this argument, we'll take the official story at face value. Every single one of the hijackers was in the country legally on a visa issued by the State Department. Noticed that I didn't say "properly" issued. It if had been properly issued the State Department would have done a proper background check to have determined the risk these individuals presented. Further, some of the visas had expired, but the individuals were still in the country. Had the U.S. federal government deported them? Of course not. They didn't even know where they were, or if they were in the country. The Feds really didn't care, no more than they cared when private citizens alerted the FBI that there were foreign students asking to learn to fly planes but not to land them.<br />
<br />
Cuba -- Cubans in South Florida's exiled Cuban community sends things back and forth between the mainland and Cuba all the time, even occasionally themselves. Oh, this isn't advertised. It is very illegal and highly dangerous, but it goes on, and with a frequency that would shock just about anyone.<br />
<br />
20 million+ illegal immigrants -- 20 million, 15 million, 30 million. The numbers vary depending on the source. No matter, it is still a lot of people. More people than should be able to simply waltz across a national border without being accosted. What's more, the debate it racist in assuming these illegal immigrants are all Mexican. They are not. Go to any Westside Los Angeles restaurant and there you'll hear U.K. English, Australian, South African, Canadian accents galore. No one really complains about those illegals, they blend in. They are here though. Like the 9/11 hijackers, most arrive via student or tourist visas and simply never leave. The Feds are simply so incompetent that the White illegals can live and work here for years without risk of being discovered. <br />
<br />
Mexico -- Can we say drugs? It isn't just people flowing into the U.S. Tunnels under the wall, over the wall, through the wall. Yes, that wall, that very expensive wall that was supposed to stop it all. And what about the submarines running those drugs across the Gulf of Mexico and up the Mississippi? We catch one of those every once in a while, but how many don't we catch? And why exactly is it that the Obama administration is giving weapons to the drug cartels in Mexico? Please explain that one to me. It hasn't gotten much press in America (surprise, surprise), but <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Fast_and_Furious">Operation Fast and Furious</a></i>, certainly has gotten a lot of press elsewhere. The Obama Administration has claimed it knew nothing about it, but that is quite simply not believable. You don't supply a massive cache of weapons to a criminal element of an ally nation without the President of the United States signing off on it. Why? Because doing so is an act of war; it constitutes an effort to undermine the government.<br />
<br />
These are just a few examples, I'm certain I could come up with more, including complications caused by multi-nationals (which will have to be another post). But here are the points: <br />
<br />
<br />
<ul><li>The Federal government is doing a lousy job of protecting our borders.</li>
<li>The Federal government doesn't even appear to be inclined to want to protect our borders.</li>
<li>The Federal government is failing to do proper background checks on visitors and immigrants into the country.</li>
<li>The Federal government is failing to keep track of those visitors and to expel those who commit crimes or who over stay their visa.</li>
<li>The Federal government is providing weapons to criminals to use against our own border guards.</li>
<li>The Federal government appears to be inclined to put our borders at risk by inciting war with out neighboring friendly nations.</li>
</ul><br />
<br />
In fact, and this can hardly be argued, the Federal government's every domestic regulatory and police effort appears to be focused on peaceful Americans instead. How do you explain that?<br />
<br />
And the result, what do we have? 9/11. Attempted terrorist incidents (although apparently many of these were false flag operations orchestrated by the FBI). Crime by illegals. Lost jobs. Lost public resources due to illegal consumption. Lost civil liberties. An economy in tatters. Lost security and lost confidence in government. Government has become the enemy. <br />
<br />
So, let's ask ourselves, why not let the States manage their own customs and immigration? Why not let them police their own borders? How would that work and could it be any worse? We'll explore that next. In the meantime, comments?The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-37732819313794925802011-08-30T06:38:00.000-07:002011-08-30T06:41:05.833-07:00Stewart, Obama, and DOMAFor those who are still operating under the delusion that Barack Obama, or even the Democrat Party, is a friend to sexual minorities, please watch this funny, and as always, pointed Jon Stewart segment. <br />
<br />
<div style="background-color:#000000;"><div style="padding:4px;"><embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:394896" height="200" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" base="." flashVars=""></embed><p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-august-17-2011/doma-sweet-doma---beer---anchor-nursing">The Daily Show - DOMA Sweet DOMA</a></b><br />
Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/'>Political Humor & Satire Blog</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p></div></div><br />
(<b><i>ED.</i></b> The video also subtly observes that one of the Republican candidates that the mainstream media is pushing for the GOP, Rick Santorum, is just as fuzzyheaded as Obama when it comes to thinking clearly on this issue. Ron Paul, however, the "unserious" candidate, whom the media tells us "doesn't have a chance," says to let the States handle the issue independently each in their own manner. That sounds like a better solution to me than this one-size-fits all madness.)The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-79778088741552899672011-08-17T13:12:00.000-07:002011-08-17T13:13:42.879-07:00Why default is a moral option...<div style="text-align: center;"><object height="195" width="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqoGORXAv2o&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqoGORXAv2o&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="320" height="195"></embed></object></div>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-89242249853123592442011-08-16T11:24:00.000-07:002011-08-16T11:24:15.921-07:00Let the media snow job begin...<iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&playlist_cid=&media_type=video&content=7XR3WG1B6WZ67PTZ&read_more=1&widget_type_cid=svp" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-6398202082009344052011-04-30T10:22:00.000-07:002011-09-20T07:19:46.867-07:00Sarah Jane, you will be missed.<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">It is easy to write grand notes on the passing of great politicians and industrialists, less so on those who have simply made the lives of others more pleasant through their talent, charm and generosity. The Snark is saddened to note last week's passing of Elizebeth Sladen, better know for almost four decades to Dr. Who fans as the indomitable and effervescent Sarah Jane Smith. Ms. Sladen passed quietly on April 19, with few outside her family having even become aware that she was badly ill with cancer. She was 63, and appeared to be half her age and in perfect health. The fifth season of the popular Sarah Jane Chronicles was due to begin shooting this next month. </span>
<br />
<div style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px;">
<br /></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-icv0LKXoX8Q/TbxE4otiteI/AAAAAAAAAHk/fqC_NoVHLw8/s1600/elisabeth_sladen_sarah_jane_smith_with_k9.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="238" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-icv0LKXoX8Q/TbxE4otiteI/AAAAAAAAAHk/fqC_NoVHLw8/s320/elisabeth_sladen_sarah_jane_smith_with_k9.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="font: 12.0px Helvetica; margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px;">
<br /></div>
The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-88634508149389570602010-07-09T09:12:00.000-07:002010-07-09T09:12:57.926-07:00The Office Manager SpeaksRahm Emanuel, chief of staff for President Obama, has issued a press release saying that<a href="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2010/07/01/the-spy-scare/"> the arrest of 10 Russian agents</a> who spent years in the U.S. posing as Americans citizens sends a signal to other countries that the U.S. is "on guard."<br />
<br />
It's ironic that Emanuel would presume to comment on anyone else's "posing as an American citizen" given that he is a duel national and has even worked with the Israeli Defense Force. Further, there is <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/article/2008/jun/02/00006/">ample evidence</a> that the only reason these Russian spies may have been ejected is because Israel doesn't want any competition when it comes to <a href="http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/05/03/the-spies-who-got-away/">b<span id="goog_918898383"></span>rokering stolen U.S. intelligence information</a><span id="goog_918898384"></span>.<br />
<br />
Why is this man being given a platform to speak on any issue? He is not the President of the United States. He is not the Press Secretary. He is not even an elected official. He is an office administrator. FoxNews insults democracy and the American people by giving this man a soapbox.<br />
<br />
Of course, maybe Rahm Emanuel isn't just the chief of staff, which might explain why he never seems to be outside of whispering range of Barrack Obama -- but in that case, <a href="http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2009/08/rahm-emanuel-puppeteer-chicago-thug.html">what exactly is his role</a>?The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-38992844732229321302010-07-09T08:37:00.000-07:002010-07-09T08:40:20.410-07:00The only person doing anything involuntary...The only person doing anything involuntary here is Oscar Grant, who is involuntarily dying.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jFNDK8PQGNw&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jFNDK8PQGNw&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="350"></embed></object></div><br />
Amazingly, Oakland did not erupt in flames last night after an all-White jury found the cop that did this killing guilty of involuntary manslaughter rather than murder. Time will tell whether true justice is finally done in the case of Oscar Grant.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-49367364449263319322010-02-23T15:30:00.000-08:002010-02-23T15:30:01.732-08:00A Good Cup of Joe<div style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0" height="245" id="msnbc6f75fb" width="420"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=35537667&width=420&height=245"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><embed name="msnbc6f75fb" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" width="420" height="245" FlashVars="launch=35537667&width=420&height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="opaque" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></div><div style="background: transparent; color: #999999; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; margin-top: 5px; text-align: center; width: 420px;">Visit msnbc.com for <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; color: #5799DB !important; font-weight: normal !important; height: 13px; text-decoration: none !important;">breaking news</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; color: #5799DB !important; font-weight: normal !important; height: 13px; text-decoration: none !important;">world news</a>, and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032072" style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #999 !important; color: #5799DB !important; font-weight: normal !important; height: 13px; text-decoration: none !important;">news about the economy</a></div>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-30103286929491550312009-10-09T16:15:00.000-07:002009-10-09T16:48:14.601-07:00ROTFLThis is not a good thing, not even for the Obama administration. Half of America is gasping; the other half rolling on the floor laughing. As my waitress at breakfast exclaimed, while reading the news over my shoulder, "For what?"<br />
<br />
It's a good question. The nomination deadline was February 1, less than two weeks after he took office. The voting for the prize reportedly took place many months ago, so the possibility exists that Obama may even have won the prize prior to the Cairo Speech, which is arguably the only significant policy change that he has even announced (although not much followed through on).<br />
<br />
It is indeed laughable. The Norwegians have made a laughing stock of Alfred Nobel's intent, of Norway, and demeaned each deserving person who previously won the prize by deserving it.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-79653538561545909862009-10-09T15:58:00.000-07:002009-10-09T16:49:53.633-07:00Good CompanyObama isn't the first sitting U.S. president to win the Peace Price. The first was Teddy Roosevelt, in 1906. Roosevelt was not known as a peaceful man, but rather as one who was fond of shooting things and who established America a globe straddling empire. The second was Woodrow Wilson, in 1919, who is considered by many scholars to have be the worst of American presidents. Wilson was also the president who took America into World War I, a self-serving and decidedly non-peaceful decision that (even Winston Churchill concluded) lead directly to World War II.<br />
<br />
If we know people by the company they keep, Obama having received this award bodes well for anything but peace. He is already the leader of a country that is waging war on two countries that did not attack his own, that is maintaining a concentration camp in contravention to the Geneva Accords, and a network of unlawful (no-longer-quite-so-secret) prisons throughout a network of host states.<br />
<br />
One has to wonder by exactly what standards do the Scandicavians judge peace? Or did they just have a little too much Aquavit the other night? Perhaps this is some version of a drunken practical joke.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-50338490660061445742009-02-22T21:00:00.000-08:002009-10-09T16:50:29.648-07:00Best ActressKate Winslet may have gotten the Oscar, but Meryl Streep got the Award. Wow.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-30101042059003026582009-02-14T09:19:00.000-08:002009-02-14T09:37:39.786-08:00Love thy own son first...<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size:16px;"><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">Maybe if the son of the homophobic mega-church pastor had not had to spend his life hiding his sexuality from his father... Perhaps if his father had embraced and loved him, as Jesus had instructed him to... Maybe if the son had had the option of forming a loving, committed relationship, of even getting married... Perhaps if the son had been home that night with his own husband, their own children, instead of cruising a public park... <br /></span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">...then Potter's House founder T.D. Jakes would not now be facing the embarrassment he now faces (but so richly deserves) as his son stands charged of trying to participate in a circle-jerk with two policeman in a Dallas park. Reverend, you reap what you sow.</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">And, dear reader, ask yourself this additional question... Do you really believe those two Dallas policeman had their own willies in their pants when they arrested Jermaine Jakes? (If so, I've got bridge in Alaska to sell you.) Dallas' Finest -- we hope that Jermaine wouldn't have gotten himself arrested for anything less than prime -- were breaking the law, in order to induce someone else into breaking the law. This was entrapment pure and simple. </span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br /></span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">It only goes to prove, any fool who lives in Texas is exactly that </span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style=""><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: 'times new roman';"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;">-- most especially if you are Black and Gay.</span></span></span></span></p></span>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-38157173497869025992009-02-06T14:20:00.000-08:002011-09-20T07:22:05.240-07:00Who is that rising star on the Israeli flag?<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit;"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avigdor_Lieberman" style="color: #3366cc; font-weight: bold;"><span class="Apple-style-span">Avigdor Lieberman</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span"> -- and he makes Saddam Hussein look to have been downright humanitarian. </span>
</span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span></span>
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">He not only advocates total Apartheid, but wants to also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/world/middleeast/07mideast.html?pagewanted=print" style="color: #3366cc; font-weight: bold;">strip non-Jewish Israelis of their citizenship</a>. Why bother with with a two-state solution, when you can just kick them all out; let them to wonder the globe, stateless. However, that might not be quite enough of a final solution for Lieberman. He has also <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090113/wl_mideast_afp/mideastconflictgazaliebermanwwii" style="color: #3366cc; font-weight: bold;">advocated a holocaust</a> of sorts against the captive population in the Gaza camp, even going so far as to obliquely suggest the use of nuclear weapons to accomplish an ethnic cleansing. </span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: inherit; font-size: small;">And this guy presumes to be an Israeli-Obama, the change candidate of our "nearest and dearest" ally. If the real Obama doesn't want to end up being compared to Chamberlain, rather than Lincoln, he better consider carefully our relationship with Israel. Least we forget, America considered Germany an ally at the start of WWII. The Bush family was even involved in underwriting Germany's war bonds. It would be unconscionable if we were to repeat the mistake of closing our eyes to horror, merely so we could make some money off of the devil.</span></span></span>
<br />
<div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 14px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></span></div>
The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-7285305541768017522009-02-06T12:02:00.000-08:002009-02-14T09:40:06.586-08:00Constructive Engagement<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size:16px;"><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style=" ;font-family:'times new roman';font-size:18px;">A comment found below the McClatchy story on Cliff Cornell, the young Army "deserter" (read, "Iraq protester") who was recently deported by that holier-than-thou "peace-mongering" nation to our north. </span><br /></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><br /></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 17px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/mi_comments/comment/edit/63540#comment-63540" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204); "></a></p><blockquote><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 17px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/mi_comments/comment/edit/63540#comment-63540" style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 102, 204); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">To those in uniform who are attacking Mr. Cornell</span></span></a></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; text-align: right; font: normal normal normal 11px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">new</span></span></b></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 11px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">Submitted by tharms on February 6, 2009 - 7:54pm.</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 19px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">Gentlemen, your commitment to your country, under the U.S. constitution, is limited to two years. Period. Look it up. Further, that is for the express purpose of defending this country, not for freeing other countries. Not for liberating oil. Not for making the world safe for democracy. It certainly isn't for the purpose of killing and torturing innocent civilians half a world away just because they pray to the wrong god.</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 19px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">So waving the flag at the disillusioned and expecting them to bow down to your sacrifice if probably not the best strategy. You joined up because you wanted a salary and because you wanted to feel good about yourself--and possibly because you really were gullible enough to buy into Bush's line of Texas bullshit. And when you come home, and are protecting New York Harbor or the Golden Gate, undoubtedly you will find each and every one of these critics respecting your commitment, but until then you shouldn't be overly surprised by their hostility. You've cooperated in great embarrassment to this country -- and you did so willing. At least Cliff Cornell had the integrity to stand up and say "no" to what he knew was wrong. He's justifiably earned some respect for that.</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 19px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">Serving the American nation, the American people and serving the American government are two different things. One is a group composed of your families, your neighbors, your towns, cities and states; the other is a group who used to work for the former, but who has now taken over the latter -- and their intent is to build an empire paid for with the sweat of American labor and the blood of American youth. That's you, that's your blood they intend to spill, and for what? Oil? The false hope of democracy in some foreign land? For expanded markets for corporations we're having to bailout with taxpayers money anyway? Ask yourself, is this really the way it is suppose to work? Is this really what Franklin and Jefferson intended? Is this really worth dying for?</span></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 19px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'courier new';">The American people have been made decidedly less safe, less respected, and less prosperous by this misadventure in Iraq -- and the blowback will haunt us, our children, your children, for generations. If you want to talk about taking responsibility. Take some responsibility for that -- or at least give it some thought. Surprising as it might be, you just might discover that, instead of criticizing Cliff Cornell, it is far more patriotic to join him.</span></span></p></blockquote><p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 12px; margin-left: 0px; line-height: 19px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Verdana; background-color: rgb(255, 254, 231); color: rgb(51, 51, 51); "></p></span>The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31909105.post-46639427368649381242009-02-06T09:29:00.000-08:002009-02-06T09:36:53.815-08:00Faux DiversityPresident Obama says his new team of economic advisors is diverse, not stacked with sycophant "yes" men (and women). So, surely we will find among the Keynesians, a few free-marketers, an Austrian economists or two, perhaps a representative of the Cato Institute, if not someone from Auburn? Nope -- not a one. <br /><br />Mr. President, your openness to a diversity of economic opinion is about as authentic as your openness to sexual diversity -- in short, you are a puppet of the old corporate financial elite, dressed up in a nice Africa-American suit. You are just as white and bigoted and as opposed to true equality for the disadvantages as those limousine liberals from the other Hyde Park were 75 years ago.The Snarkmeisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05992786071359371612noreply@blogger.com0